How to choose the right coach/ consultant for your organisation

How to choose the right coach / consultant for your organisation

By Jess Lorimer

Making the choice to bring external suppliers into your organisation can be a tricky one. Normally organisations make hiring decisions based on a range of factors with personality fit, current skill set, performance at interview and future potential all being top of mind.

But hiring an external coach / consultant is different. 

They’re not going to be part of the organisation on a permanent basis – and so whilst it’s important that they’re a good fit, the focus (and decision making around who to hire) is more strongly rooted in their ability to help the organisation achieve the commercial transformations promised.

So what should organisations be looking for in external suppliers to ensure that they make the best choice and engage the right provider?

At The Expert Services Directory, we believe that there are five key elements to engaging the right external provider for your organisation – and if you want to see the range of coaches and consultants that we recommend? Click here and you’ll be able to see the variety of experts working successfully with organisations around the UK.

Five key elements to ensure you engage the right coaches / consultants in your organisation

  1. Specialist skills: When engaging an external coach / consultant, organisations are often looking for specific skills so that commercial goals can be achieved. When searching for the right external supplier, it’s important to stay focused on the critical specialist skills required rather than looking at their broader skills. With permanent employees, considering wider skills is key to understanding the long-term value that hire could bring… but with external suppliers who are working on specialist programmes / projects of work, it’s more important to ensure that they meet critical skill criteria and that they are using those skills regularly so that your company is able to get faster outcomes.
  2. Stakeholder engagement skills: External suppliers don’t require the same ‘ramp up’ period as permanent employees when it comes to performing within their specialist area of expertise… but engaging a great external provider means ensuring that they’ve got key stakeholder engagement skills so that they’re able to work easily and effectively within the organisation. During the sales process, watch how they engage, track whether they do what they promise (when they promise it!) and assess their soft skills to see whether they’ll be a good fit working with your stakeholders.
  3. Commercial acumen: External providers are often brought in to support organisations to achieve commercially critical goals… and this means that the best providers understand why these goals are critical for the organisation and the wider business case. External providers often have key conversations with senior leadership and you’ll want a provider who is able to demonstrate professional skill alongside commercial awareness to help your organisation hit key milestones and deliverables that matter.
  4. Being invested: The sales process that an external supplier takes you through – matters. When you’re searching for the right external provider to work with your organisation and move into a sales process with a provider? That’s your opportunity to see how they manage expectations, work to timelines and assess their keenness to work with your organisation/ understanding of your brand.
  5. Credentials: Permanent employees are often asked to provide references – in a way that is not expected or the norm for external providers who often work under non-disclosure agreements. During the search / selection process to find the right external provider for your organisation, it’s a good opportunity to ask about their credentials. This doesn’t solely refer to qualifications… Instead, ask about recent projects / programmes of work, challenges other clients have faced before working with them and case studies (if they’re able to share.)

You might notice that we haven’t written about budget being a major factor when hiring an external supplier. Most organisations have a defined idea of what they want to spend when working with an external provider… and sometimes that can need to change when they start the selection / sales process and understand the skills / experience / credentials needed to source the supplier that is going to work best for the organisation and critical commercial goals.

The reality around hiring external suppliers is that organisations will pay a premium to source specialist skills, competencies and create a competitive advantage that they wouldn’t achieve without hiring that external supplier and their expertise. This doesn’t mean that organisations should waste time sourcing suppliers that are outside of budget requirements – but it does mean that any external provider should be managing budget expectations early and communicating transparently so that you’re able to understand available solutions that meet all commercial requirements. 

And if your organisation is looking for coaches / consultants / trainers / speakers or done-for- you service providers? Make sure you take a look at our Directory where we list qualified suppliers who are successfully working with organisations around the UK to achieve commercially critical outcomes.

We know the skills and competencies we want… but how do we make sure the provider really has them?

Hiring an external provider can feel tricky because traditional interview processes and references don’t apply. Instead, having sales calls with them is generally the way to assess their true competencies and skills. 

When hiring an external provider, it’s important to use their sales process to assess:

  • Questioning: What types of questions do they ask you / other decision makers? Do their questions demonstrate the level of critical thinking and commercial awareness that you’re looking to use in your project / programme of work?
  • Credible examples: Are they able to talk competently about their area of expertise and proactively share credible insights or examples that demonstrate their knowledge and skills?
  • Communication: Are they a clear, confident communicator who you would feel comfortable presenting to senior leadership within the organisation? And do they communicate professionally, proactively and productively at all times?
  • Challenge: Are they able to challenge thoughts and perceptions in a courteous and constructive way? Would you be happy for them to hold or lead challenging conversations within the organisation?
  • Expectation Management: Are they able to clearly manage expectations around project scope, pricing and key deliverables? More importantly, do they do what they say they’ll do – when they say they’ll do it during the sales process? Because that gives key indicators as to how they’ll show up during the delivery process.

If you want to bring qualified, credible experts into your organisation to work on projects / programmes of work that matter? Check out our Directory here and search for specialists who are successfully working with organisations in the UK to achieve critical commercial goals.

    Looking for suppliers? let us know.





    External suppliers

    Top 3 reasons external suppliers are a great choice for 2026

    By Jess Lorimer

    The 2025 business landscape was challenging – and one of the ways it hit organisations hardest?

    Retaining talent. 

    Specifically, retaining great permanent employees during restructuring periods and then having to ask them to add more to their job role, often outside their own area of expertise.

    Sadly, this has led to over three quarters of workers in the UK feeling some degree of burnout and increased pressure due to holding multiple responsibilities and roles… and for companies in the UK, it’s led to a costly increase in stress and burnout related absences.

     But what is the true cost of employee burnout to organisations across the UK?

    Organisations around the UK know that employees across various disciplines are taking on more responsibility in their job role than their original job description stated. This increased responsibility has led to higher levels of burnout and in December 2024, the MHFA released reports to show that work-related mental health issues (including stress and burnout related to roles) was costing the UK economy £57.4 billion per year.

    It’s a staggering statistic… but what does it mean in real-terms for organisations?

    • Increased absence: Most employees suffering with burnout / role related stress are taking in excess of 22 days absence per year; a significant financial cost for organisations in a challenging economic climate.
    • Decreased productivity: With the rise in ‘culture rot’ alongside burnout and role related stress, organisations are seeing a significant increase in presenteeism (lost productivity) with Deloitte estimating a cost of £24 billion to employers annually.
    • Significant attrition in key talent groups: Organisations are being clearer than ever before to make the right hiring decisions (especially with the changes to the Employment Rights Bill) but companies who are hiring talented employees who experience burnout / role related stress are seeing key hires leaving – after the significant recruitment, absence and presenteeism related costs. 

    This stalls key projects, impacts future growth and makes hitting diversity goals even more difficult.

    Essentially, it means that employees who are tasked with too much are burning out and costing organisations around the UK thousands of pounds in associated costs.

    And whilst most organisations know (and are seeing the effects daily), it’s hard for leaders to stop tasking employees with additional workloads when:

    • Strategic plans still need implementing – even if there are fewer employees to make it happen.
    • Targets are higher than ever but also, more commercially important to achieve critical profit milestones.
    • Employees want clear career progression and see taking on new tasks and responsibilities as critical to professional development, rather than understanding how additional workload is impacting their overall performance in their area of specialism.

    Which is where outsourcing / hiring external suppliers can help…

    Usually, the mere mention of hiring an external supplier generates a raised eyebrow and the immediate; ‘What’s the point in hiring an external consultant who’ll just give us the same advice but charge a lot more for it?!’ and honestly?

    Times have changed.

    Smart organisations around the UK have been outsourcing specialist areas of expertise for years – with incredibly successful results. The reality in hiring outsourced talent is that whilst organisations do pay additional costs for external coaches, consultants and trainers, they also benefit hugely from:

    • Access to specialist skills / areas of expertise for specific project work that they don’t have in-house or that their in-house resources are too busy to focus on full time.
    • Not having to pay the same employee related costs associated with permanent headcount – because with an external supplier, there aren’t any National Insurance, sick pay or company benefits package costs. Companies are simply paying them for the skills and experience they need – at the time it’s needed.
    • Increased innovation from external suppliers who are bringing knowledge and experiences from all of the work that they do which helps companies to avoid operating in a vacuum (and brings best practice and fresh ideas to the table)
    • The ability to have permanent staff focusing on core business functions that grow the business and bottom line, rather than developing niche areas of specialism that only benefit the organisation once. 

    And this all leads to companies retaining permanent employees who are able to be more productive by focusing on their core skill sets and generating higher profits as an organisation as a result. If your organisation is interested in looking at specialist providers who can add critical knowledge and support so that permanent staff can focus on their core skills, click here to see our range of specialist providers.

    How can external suppliers add commercial value to organisations in 2026?

    Previously, external suppliers have been seen as a ‘threat’ to permanent staff – which couldn’t be further from the truth. External suppliers should be brought into organisations where their specialist skill set is required (and where organisations don’t have the usual time available to ‘ramp up’ permanent employees.)

    Unlike permanent staff, external suppliers like coaches, consultants, trainers and done-for-you service providers are there to provide specialist skills immediately so that organisations can see immediate benefit, transformation and commercial improvements.

    This means that (good!) external providers are able to:

    • Support organisations with diagnostics to understand the issue(s) that they’re facing in specific areas and suggest solutions that will have immediate commercial benefits.
    • Add expertise and value on starting without any ‘ramp up’ period so that the organisation benefits from quicker results.
    • Use specialist skills to support the commercial transformations that the organisation is looking to achieve.
    • Provide advice and proactively support organisations to avoid obstacles by contributing based on their work within a variety of environments and experiences.
    • Offboard and hand over completed projects to the designated permanent staff member so that the learning outcomes and commercial transformations are fully realised by the organisation.

    What kind of external suppliers could your organisation benefit from using in 2026?

    Historically, organisations have been used to seeing traditional consultants or fractional resources working on key programmes of work. But as the world has changed, so has the variety of external suppliers that organisations are able to benefit from. 

    Whilst it’s not an exhaustive list, the following examples show where external suppliers can add benefit to commercial projects / programmes of work.

    • Executive Coaching: For leaders and top talent to increase performance, retention of key staff and support critical commercial targets.
    • Marketing: Fractional marketing resources to support strategic initiatives and specialist implementation for key programmes of work.
    • Finance: Using fractional finance resource to support commercial growth (including fundraising / raising investment) or training non-financial employees to understand core concepts to boost profit.
    • Change / Transformation: Using consultants / speakers and trainers to provide specialist resource for major change / transformation programmes from scoping through to implementation.
    • Leadership: Using leadership development experts to support new and existing leaders to learn new skills, adapt their leadership style, develop executive presence and support the retention of valued talent.
    • Health and Wellness: Using coaches / consultants / trainers and speakers to develop awareness of key health conditions, give support and advice on reasonable adjustment policies and support organisations to meet legal requirements / obligations.
    • Communications: Using fractional communications resources to support both internal and external communications initiatives.
    • Culture: Using coaches / consultants and speakers to change behaviours, challenge perceptions and make critical culture changes that impact performance, inclusion and leadership.
    • Talent Development: Using coaches / consultants to consult on career development pathways to meet critical staffing targets and inspire and motivate staff to take autonomy over their career goals. 

    (And if you’d like to check out our wide range of coaches, consultants, speakers, trainers and done-for-you service providers, you can look at our Directory here where we list the best external suppliers according to their skillsets and location)

    So what are the top three reasons that organisations should be looking to use external suppliers in 2026?

    If we look at how organisations need to operate in 2026 to ensure high levels of profit and avoiding the loss of top permanent talent through burnout and overwhelm… there are three key reasons that organisations hugely benefit from hiring external suppliers.

    1. Specialist skills: Bringing an external supplier in to fulfil a critical commercial need means that organisations are able to meet business objectives quickly and efficiently – and being able to remove the cost of external suppliers when the specialist skills are no longer needed / programme is complete.
    2. Benefitting from external perspectives: Organisations can avoid costly mistakes and obstacles by using specialist external providers who’ve worked across multiple environments and understand the potential hazards within their area of expertise. This is especially critical when considering that permanent staff are often expected to learn specialist skills alongside their day-to-day role and may not have the same awareness / exposure to potential obstacles that external suppliers will see and handle each day.
    3. Cost reduction: Using external suppliers is a great way for organisations to benefit from specialist skills without increasing permanent headcount costs or paying the associated benefits.

    If your organisation is ready to bring fresh perspectives, best practice and support your permanent staff to focus on their core skills each day but needs specialists to support within key programmes of work? Click here to check out our Directory where you can find expert coaches, consultants, trainers, speakers and done-for-you service providers who work with organisations around the UK in a range of specialisms.

    Why Charity Leaders Don’t Need More Resilience

    They Need Better Support

    Written by Sally Dhillon, Nudge Forward

    “Be more resilient.”

    For charity leaders, this phrase has become background noise — well-intentioned, familiar, and increasingly unhelpful.

    Since the Covid pandemic, resilience has been championed as the answer to everything: uncertainty, pressure, burnout, complexity, change. Leaders have been encouraged to dig deep, push on and adapt — again and again.

    And while resilience matters, many charity leaders I work with are already incredibly resilient.

    The problem is this: resilience has been overplayed, and in some cases, misused. It has subtly shifted responsibility away from systems and support, and placed it squarely on individuals — as if the solution to sustained pressure is simply to cope better.

    In today’s not-for-profit context, that falls short of what leaders and managers need right now.

    THE REALITY CHARITY LEADERS ARE OPERATING IN

    We are no longer in a “crisis period” that will eventually pass.

    Charity leaders are now operating in a permanent state of flux, where external pressures rarely quieten down:

    • Funding is uncertain and increasingly competitive
    • Costs continue to rise
    • Economic and political volatility affects demand, donors and commissioning
    • Regulatory and governance expectations are higher
    • Digital and technological change is accelerating
    • Need and complexity within communities are growing

    This is not about bouncing back to how things were. It’s about leading well in conditions that are continually shifting.

    And that requires more than personal grit.

    If this feels familiar, you can view my listing in the Expert Services Directory to see how I support charity leaders navigating complexity like this.

    WHEN RESILIENCE BECOMES A RISK

    Here’s the uncomfortable truth: when resilience is over-emphasised, it can become a risk.

    It can:

    • Normalise overload
    • Silence leaders who are struggling
    • Discourage reflection in favour of endurance
    • Lead to decision-making from fatigue rather than clarity.

    I regularly meet charity CEOs and senior leaders who are:

    • Holding enormous responsibility with little space to think
    • Supporting teams emotionally while neglecting their own needs
    • Making high-stakes decisions under sustained pressure
    • Quietly questioning how long this pace is sustainable.

    They don’t need another reminder to be resilient.

    They need permission — and support — to pause, reflect and lead intentionally.

    FROM RESILIENCE TO SUPPORTED LEADERSHIP

    What charity leaders need now is a shift from resilience to supported leadership.

    That means creating space for leaders to:

    • Step out of constant reaction mode
    • Think clearly about what matters most now
    • Make grounded, values-led decisions
    • Lead in ways that are sustainable for themselves and their people.

    This isn’t indulgent. It’s essential.

    Because leaders who are supported:

    • Make better strategic decisions
    • Communicate more clearly
    • Model healthier ways of working
    • Are better able to support their teams
    • Stay connected to purpose, not just pressure.

    If leadership sustainability is on your agenda, my Expert Services Directory listing outlines how I work with charities and not-for-profits to create this kind of support.

    PUTTING THE OXYGEN MASK ON FIRST

    The airline analogy is overused — but it remains painfully accurate.

    Charity leaders are often the last to put their own oxygen mask on. 

    There’s always:

    • A funding deadline
    • A staffing issue
    • A safeguarding concern
    • A board paper to write
    • A service under pressure.

    Yet without space to breathe, leaders lose perspective — and perspective is exactly what’s needed to lead well in complexity.

    Safe, structured reflection allows leaders to:

    • Process emotional load
    • Sense-check decisions
    • Reconnect with values
    • Avoid reactive or fear-based leadership
    • Lead their organisations with steadiness and clarity.

    This is not about stepping away from responsibility. It’s about leading with greater intention and impact.

    SUPPORTING PEOPLE, NOT JUST PERFORMANCE

    When leaders are stretched thin, the impact on teams is immediate.

    Managers become transactional. 

    Conversations are rushed. 

    Tensions go unaddressed. 

    Wellbeing becomes a tick-box rather than a lived value.

    Supported leaders are better able to:

    • Hold boundaries compassionately
    • Address performance issues early and clearly
    • Support wellbeing without over-functioning
    • Create psychologically safe environments
    • Develop others, rather than carrying everything themselves.

    In a sector built on care, values and human connection, how leaders lead matters as much as what they deliver.

    LEADING THE MISSION — IN A WAY THAT MAKES SENSE NOW

    Many charity leaders are asking themselves: “How do we pursue our mission in this context — not the one we wish we were operating in?”

    This is where support becomes strategic.

    Leaders need space to:

    • Reassess priorities
    • Make tough but necessary trade-offs
    • Ensure operations are financially and organisationally sustainable
    • Make smarter use of technology and systems
    • Align impact with resources realistically available.

    This isn’t about lowering ambition. It’s about protecting the mission by leading it wisely.

    If you’re navigating these questions, my Expert Services Directory listing shares how I support leaders to think clearly and act decisively in uncertain conditions.

    WHAT BETTER SUPPORT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE

    Better support for charity leaders isn’t about adding more to their plate.

    It looks like:

    • Confidential coaching spaces for honest reflection
    • Time to think, not just do
    • Practical leadership development grounded in real challenges
    • Support with identity, confidence and decision-making
    • A trusted partner who understands the sector context.

    This kind of support helps leaders move from:

    • Surviving → sustaining
    • Coping → leading
    • Reacting → shaping

    And importantly, it helps them stay in the role — with energy, purpose and perspective intact.

    MOVING FORWARD

    Resilience will always matter. But resilience without support is not a strategy to move you forward.

    Charity leaders don’t need to toughen up.
    They don’t need to absorb more pressure.
    They don’t need to do this alone.

    What they need is space, reflection and support — so they can lead their people well, make smart decisions, and steward their mission responsibly in a complex world.
    If you’re a CEO or People & Culture lead in a charity, social enterprise or not-for-profit organisation and want leadership support that is grounded, values-led and fit for today’s realities, here’s a nudge to view my listing in the Expert Services Directory to learn more about affordable services from Nudge Forward.

    When Growth Means Goodbye: What Layoffs Are Really Costing Tech Leaders

    When Growth Means Goodbye: What Layoffs Are Really Costing Tech Leaders

    By Susan O’Connor, Shift Left Ltd – Leadership Development for Women in Tech

    Layoff patterns continue to hit women hardest. The real cost? Lost leadership capability, slower delivery, and cultures that can’t sustain transformation.

    Tech Leaders — We Need to Talk About the Hidden Cost of “Rebalancing”

    IBM has just announced another round of cuts — thousands of roles, mostly in the US.
    Not a shock. Not unusual. Not isolated.

    It’s part of a pattern we’ve watched spread across the industry: restructuring, flattening, “rebalancing”, “optimising”, “aligning to future strategy”, “leveraging AI efficiencies”… pick your preferred corporate synonym for letting people go.

    The headlines focus on the numbers. But they miss the human truth inside the business:

    The real cost isn’t who goes. It’s who’s left — and what they’re left with.

    Organisations are cutting people faster than they’re developing leaders to replace them. And inside engineering, product, and tech functions, the cracks aren’t hairline anymore. They’re structural.

    If you’re a CTO, VP Engineering, Director of Product or senior HR leader, this raises a question you cannot ignore:

    “Who is being cut, and what is that really costing us in leadership, culture, and

    Here’s What the Patterns Shows

    We don’t yet have gender-specific figures for the most recent round of layoffs — ONS workforce data always lags by 12–24 months.

    But here’s what we DO know from the data we have:

    1. Every major redundancy wave has disproportionately impacted women.

    ·   In Europe, women made up 41.6% of tech layoffs despite being only a third of the workforce.

    ·   In the US, women accounted for 46% of tech layoffs during October 2022–June 2023.

    2. UK workforce data shows women’s representation falls even when the tech sector grows

    ·   Q4 2022 → Q1 2023: women in tech fell by ~17,000.

    ·   Q1 2023 → Q2 2023: women in tech fell by ~3,000.

    Meanwhile, the overall UK tech workforce grew by around 85,000 between Q1 and Q2 2023.

    3. ONS figures show instability, not progress.
    Women in tech fluctuated sharply between Q1 2022 (447,000) and Q3 2022 (532,000), before dropping again.

    4. Representation remains fragile.
    Women still make up only ~22% of the UK tech workforce — and progress is easily reversed during economic stress.

    Given this long-term pattern, and with major tech organisations restructuring again in 2024–2025, it is entirely reasonable, and honest, to assume the same disproportionate impact has continued.

    Which means your organisation likely has fewer women in tech than it should… at the exact moment you need their leadership capability the most.

    If you’re already thinking about the risk inside your own teams, my Expert Directory listing explains exactly how I help tech leaders strengthen culture, retain women in tech, and protect the leadership capability your organisation relies on

    What Leaders Rarely See from the Inside


    In a global PayTech organisation where I held a senior leadership role, we went through multiple rounds of redundancy over the years. And here’s what most senior leaders never see or realise until it is too late.

    The people who stay, the “survivors”, carry guilt, exhaustion, fear, uncertainty, anger, anxiety, and a deep erosion of trust.

    Even when my role was not made redundant in earlier rounds, I and everyone was thinking:


    “Is my job secure?”

    “Can I trust what is being told to me?”

    “Should I be preparing to leave?”

    “Is this business in trouble”

    And when I was made redundant, the response from other women within the business was immediate:


    “I’m looking. I don’t want to stay somewhere that’s removing senior women.”

    “If they can make you redundant, no-one is safe”

    Within three months, they had left.

    Operationally, the gaps were huge: influence, continuity, delivery pace, cross-team relationships, institutional memory — gone.

    And here’s the uncomfortable truth: women talk. And when one goes, others follow.

    The Leadership Capability Organisations Lose When Women Leave

    Mid-career women bring leadership capability that is nearly impossible to replace quickly.

    When they leave, you lose leaders who can:
    • influence across departments
    • translate business needs into delivery
    • manage conflict and hold psychologically safe teams
    • maintain momentum and rebuild trust
    • anticipate risks and stakeholder reactions

    These are the exact skills you need in AI adoption, transformation and cross-functional delivery.

    If you want to retain this level of leadership capability — the influence, the continuity, the cross-functional glue — this is exactly the work I do with tech teams. You can review my Expert Directory listing to see how.

    The Opportunity Cost Tech Leaders Can’t Ignore

    When someone leaves, especially a mid-career woman, the cost is never just recruitment.

    It’s the gap.

    And gaps slow down delivery, collaboration, decision-making, quality, innovation and morale.

    Your Tech Leads and Engineering Managers suddenly become hiring managers, counsellors, fire-fighters and interim team leads.

    Meanwhile, a new hire takes 6–12 months to build the trust, influence and context the woman they replaced already had.

    AI Doesn’t Replace Leadership. It Exposes It.

    AI can generate code, summarise meetings and flag risks.

    But it cannot rebuild morale, repair trust, read the room, support humans through uncertainty or hold culture together.

    When layoffs remove women from your pipeline, AI won’t fill the gap. You need humans to do that, and you’ll have fewer of them.

    Let’s Talk About Retention — the Real Kind

    Maybe it’s too late for you and you have let a lot of your talented future leaders go and are now aware that you need to retain the ones you have left.  Here’s how you can start.

    Real retention looks like:

    • sponsorship, not vague career chats
    • leadership development that builds confidence and capability
    • managers who can lead humans, not tasks
    • psychologically safe teams
    • visible pathways into leadership

    This isn’t about “fixing women.” It’s about creating an environment in which they can develop, advance and lead effectively.

    Leadership development is often the pivot point.  It’s the stage where a high-performing woman moves from delivering excellent work to unlocking her full potential and driving meaningful impact across the organisation.

    This is where organisations like Shift Left come in.

    Our work combines practical leadership development, helping women strengthen their influence, presence, gravitas and impact. Together with coaching from experts that have worked in the industry deeper self-awareness and a clearer understanding of the behaviours within the teams and stakeholders they work with, is built. This insight is essential for effective stakeholder management, which is a critical capability for any mature, forward-thinking organisation.

    If you want to find out how this could work for you, check out our listing on the Expert Directly and get in touch

    Tech Leaders — The Three Questions You Must Ask Yourself

    1️⃣ What is the future leadership consequence of our rebalancing?
    2️⃣ Are we protecting the culture that enables innovation — or eroding it?
    3️⃣ Who are we sponsoring into the needed leadership spaces these changes create?

    Retention Isn’t a DEI Problem. It’s a Leadership Problem.

    Mid-career women are not leaving in ones and twos. They are leaving in waves.

    When they go, your organisation loses continuity, judgement, cohesion, delivery capability, influence and leadership potential — and gains cost, disruption and slower delivery.

    The Lovelace Report makes it clear: women leaving tech is one of the most expensive and preventable losses.

    What Forward-Thinking Organisations Are Doing Right Now

    Organisations working with Shift Left Ltd are:

    • retaining mid-career women
    • stabilising delivery during AI and organisational change
    • strengthening culture and psychological safety
    • accelerating women into leadership
    • reducing post-redundancy quiet attrition
    • protecting productivity through leadership capability

    Leadership — not technology — is your biggest competitive advantage.

    If your organisation is restructuring, scaling or losing people, this is the moment to act. My Expert Directory listing outlines how Shift Left Ltd helps tech leaders retain talent, grow future leaders and protect delivery during change

    Psychological Safety isn’t a Buzzword: It’s the Foundation of Effective Charity Leadership

    Psychological Safety isn’t a Buzzword: It’s the Foundation of Effective Charity Leadership 

    By Hayley Gillard – Compassionate Leaders Ltd

    Why Psychological Safety Matters More Than Ever

    In the charity and not-for-profit world, high performance isn’t just about hitting KPIs or maximising efficiency—it’s about trust, connection, and commitment to a shared mission. And yet, many teams still operate in cultures where people are too afraid to speak up, ask for help, or admit mistakes.

    That fear? It costs us. Quietly. Consistently. And in ways we don’t always measure—until good people burn out or leave.

    Which is why psychological safety should be at the top of every senior leader’s agenda. It’s not soft, fluffy, or “nice to have.” It’s the foundation that allows your people to:

    • Bring problems to light before they escalate
    • Take ownership and initiative
    • Learn and improve continuously
    • Navigate feedback, failure, and change with less friction

    It’s also the culture that helps you retain your best people—and build trust that runs deeper than job titles or policies.

    What Is Psychological Safety—Really?

    The term is often attributed as being coined by Harvard professor Amy Edmondson and refers to the shared belief that it’s safe to take interpersonal risks at work.

    In real life, that looks like:

    • Saying “I don’t know” without shame
    • Offering a different opinion without being dismissed
    • Owning up to a mistake without fearing punishment
    • Asking for help without feeling weak

    In psychologically safe teams, people feel like their voice matters—even if they’re new, junior, or different from the dominant culture. And that creates the conditions for better thinking, stronger collaboration, and healthier leadership at every level.

    The Leadership Link: Why This Starts at the Top

    Here’s what’s often misunderstood: psychological safety isn’t created by a policy or a one-off training. It’s modelled, moment by moment, by the way your leaders show up.

    If your managers:

    • React harshly to bad news
    • Avoid tough conversations
    • Shame or blame staff in public
    • Only listen to people who agree with them

    …then no amount of wellbeing initiatives will undo the damage. People will shut down, play small, and quietly disengage.

    But when leaders:

    • Stay calm under pressure
    • Invite different perspectives
    • Share their own learning moments
    • Respond with curiosity instead of criticism

    …then you start to build something far more powerful: a culture of accountability, trust, and growth.

    That’s when your teams start saying what they actually think. That’s when innovation happens. That’s when people stay.

    The Cost of Ignoring Psychological Safety

    If you’re a senior leader in a charity or social impact organisation, here’s the uncomfortable truth: without psychological safety, the risks compound.

    • Performance dips—because no one’s challenging how things are done
    • Innovation stalls—because people keep their ideas to themselves
    • Burnout rises—because people don’t feel safe enough to say they’re struggling
    • D&I efforts fall flat—because inclusion without safety is performative
    • Attrition increases—because talented, values-led staff will quietly walk away

    And the worst part? The signs are often hidden. Teams look “fine” on the surface—but scratch beneath and you’ll find frustration, fear, and unmet potential.

    What Does a Psychologically Safe Culture Actually Look Like?

    Let’s bring this to life.

    In organisations that value psychological safety, you’ll often hear:

    • “Thanks for pointing that out. Let’s look at it together.”
    • “You don’t have to get it right straight away—let’s work through it.”
    • “I hadn’t thought of it that way. Tell me more.”
    • “We can disagree and still respect each other.”

    You’ll also see:

    • Managers giving and receiving feedback without defensiveness
    • Junior staff contributing in meetings
    • People admitting when they’re stuck instead of faking it
    • Leaders sharing learning from their own mistakes

    It’s not about lowering standards. It’s about raising the bar for how we treat each other while we work towards the mission.

    Building Psychological Safety: Where to Start

    It can feel daunting to shift a culture—but it starts with small, consistent changes.

    1. Start with your managers – Managers have the most influence on people’s daily experience. Equip them with the confidence, language, and tools to lead compassionately and consistently.
    2. Model vulnerability at the top – If you’re a senior leader, you don’t have to “have it all together.” Share learning moments. Invite feedback. Show that it’s safe to be human.
    3. Reward honesty, not just results – Recognise the people who raise concerns early or speak up when something’s not working—even if it’s uncomfortable.
    4. Create shared leadership standards – Build consistency across your managers so teams know what to expect—regardless of who leads them.
    5. Train for mindset, not just method – Compassionate leadership is about confidence, clarity, and self-awareness—not just process.

    This Is the Real Work of Leadership

    If we want values-led organisations to thrive, we have to create environments where people can bring their full selves to work—not just their polished selves.

    We have to move beyond the “leadership is about being strong” myth, and instead lean into the truth: real leadership is about making it safe for others to step up.

    And when you do that? Everything else gets easier. Teams work better. Communication improves. People stay longer. And your organisation becomes a place people are proud to work in.

    A Final Thought on Psychological Safety

    Psychological safety isn’t about avoiding hard conversations or letting things slide. It’s about creating the kind of culture where people can speak up because they care.

    If your organisation is working hard on inclusion, culture change, or leadership development, this is the piece that holds it all together.

    And if you’re looking for support building this from the inside out—starting with your managers—I’d love to help.

    Visit my listing in the Expert Services Directory to see how we can work together to create a psychologically safe, high-performing culture where your people (and your mission) thrive.

    Hayley Gillard is a business psychologist and leadership consultant. Get in touch with her here.